Andrew Pollack's Blog

Technology, Family, Entertainment, Politics, and Random Noise

Does anyone believe that this was the only anti-satellite trick up Uncle Sam's heavily armored sleeve?

By Andrew Pollack on 02/21/2008 at 11:27 AM EST

If you haven't seen the news yet, the U.S. Navy used a "standard" missile launched off a navy cruiser with a special 3rd stage which is effectively a self-guided hunk of mass (a big rock) designed to home in on the target in an airless environment and simply slam into it using the differential in speeds between an orbiting body and the missile itself as the kinetic energy to cause the destruction.

Does anyone believe that plans for this sort of thing haven't been in place for quite a while, and that the bigger difficulty here wasn't taking out the satellite but rather taking it out without showing off too much technology in the process? We know China has developed anti-satellite technology, as they tested it recently out in the open. Nothing upsets the U.S. armed forces so much as a destructive capability that someone else has and they don't. So, why no "crash program" to catch up with the Chinese? Simple. It wasn't needed. The capability has likely been in place using not just this method but probably a few more impressive ones for some time. You don't just "throw together" some stuff and "hook it on" to a missile in place of its warheard with a couple of months notice for the special purpose of taking out a broken satellite so that it doesn't have a 1% chance of hurting a few dozen people when it crashes. If you have the stuff on the shelf, that's another matter.

I say bravo to the U.S. Navy for hitting the target. I also say bravo to the U.S. Government for not pretending they had no way to do this, and just crossing its fingers and hoping the thing didn't land on someone's head. Let's just not pretend there is a miracle at work here.


There are  - loading -  comments....

re: Does anyone believe that this was the only anti-satellite trick up Uncle Sam's heavily armored sleeve?By Chris Toohey on 02/21/2008 at 01:30 PM EST
Of course you don't go public with ALL of your tricks.

And I can remember a buddy of mine telling me a story that involved the branch
of the armed forces securing a one-door silo with "BFRs".

When he asked, he was told that "Well, see that earth-mover of there? We simply
'strategically place' a BFR in front of the door...".

Figured as long as we were talking about rocks.... ;-)
re: Does anyone believe that this was the only anti-satellite trick up Uncle Sam's heavily armored sleeve?By Joerg Michael on 02/21/2008 at 01:33 PM EST
Well ... I don't think they were really too concerned with hitting somebody in
the head with that thing. That probability is probably negligible. I think they
were worried that too much of the thing might actually survive re-entry.

Remember, this was a spy-in-the-sky, so there might be some interesting
technology on board.
re: Does anyone believe that this was the only anti-satellite trick up Uncle Sam's heavily armored sleeve?By Danny Lawrence on 02/21/2008 at 01:45 PM EST
The stated reason was that they were worried that the Hydrazine tank to survive
re-entry, hydrazine is nasty stuff (although I personally doubt that the tank
or its contents would have survived)

And come on, you know that the military never admits anything until they have
to, I don't think they admitted the existed U2 until Gary Powers was shot down,
and I know they didn't admit to the Stealth fighter until the first Gulf War.
re: Does anyone believe that this was the only anti-satellite trick up Uncle Sam's heavily armored sleeve?By mdmadph on 02/21/2008 at 02:09 PM EST
...not to mention that we've had this capability since about 1985, I'm pretty
sure. (where we destroyed a satellite with a missile launched from a fighter
jet. feel free to google it.)
re: Does anyone believe that this was the only anti-satellite trick up Uncle Sam's heavily armored sleeve?By Paul Gagnon on 02/22/2008 at 06:13 PM EST
yep indeed. they didn't call it "Star Wars" for nothing back in the Reagan
years. that stuff is real.
re: Does anyone believe that this was the only anti-satellite trick up Uncle Sam's heavily armored sleeve?By MOM on 02/22/2008 at 09:14 PM EST
What I heard originally was the secret tehnology of the spy system itself was
too valuable to allow to land just anywhere. Then all of sudden the story
changed and it was all about the dangerous chemicals.


Other Recent Stories...

  1. 05/05/2016Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism?Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism? I read a really insightful post a couple of days ago that suggested the use of social network funding sites like “Go Fund Me” and “Kickstarter” have come about and gained popularity in part because the existing economy in no longer serving its purpose for anyone who isn’t already wealthy. Have the traditional ways to get new ventures funded become closed to all but a few who aren’t already connected to them and so onerous as to make ...... 
  2. 04/20/2016Want to be whitelisted? Here are some sensible rules for web site advertisingAn increasing number of websites are now detecting when users have ad-blocking enabled, and refuse to show content unless you "whitelist" their site (disable your ad-blocking for them). I think that is a fair decision on their part, it's how they pay for the site. However, if you want me (and many others) to white list your site, there are some rules you should follow. If you violate these rules, I won't whitelist your site, I'll just find content elsewhere. 1. The total space taken up by advertisements ...... 
  3. 12/30/2015Fantastic new series on Syfy called “The Expanse” – for people who love traditional science fiction[] “The Expanse” is a new science fiction series being broadcast onthe Syfy channelthis winter. It’s closely based on a series of books by author James S. A. Corey beginning with “Leviathan Wakes”. There are 5 books in the “Expanse” series so far. If you’re a fan of the novels you’ll appreciate how closely the books are followed.TIP: The first five episodes are already available on Syfy.com. If you’re having trouble getting into the characters and plot, use those to get up to speed.The worlds created for ...... 
  4. 10/20/2015My suggestion is to stay away from PayAnywhere(dot)com  
  5. 08/07/2015Here is one for you VMWARE gurus - particularly if you run ESXi without fancy drive arrays 
  6. 08/06/2015The Killer of Orphans (Orphan Documents) 
  7. 06/02/2015Homeopathic Marketing: Traveler on my Android is now calling itself VERSE. Allow me to translate that for the IBM Notes community... 
  8. 03/17/2015A review of British Airways Premium Economy Service – How to destroy customer goodwill all at once 
  9. 02/26/2015There's a bug in how @TextToTime() and @ToTime() process date strings related to international standards and browser settings. 
  10. 01/21/2015Delivering two new presentations at Developer Camp (EntwicklerCamp) 2015 in Germany 
Click here for more articles.....


pen icon Comment Entry
Subject
Your Name
Homepage
*Your Email
* Your email address is required, but not displayed.
 
Your thoughts....
 
Remember Me  

Please wait while your document is saved.