Andrew Pollack's Blog

Technology, Family, Entertainment, Politics, and Random Noise

Followup - more test data with really interesting results

By Andrew Pollack on 02/23/2004 at 01:35 PM EST

I modified the test (described here: ) to try to make it resist things like random server performance changes due to whatever else the machine is doing. I've also tried to eliminate a few other variables.

The four tests were performed all at once. Each was performed 10 times, but not in order. A loop to 40 was created, and a modulus function was used to determine which test ran (e.g. if counter equaled 23, then 23/4 = 5 r3, so test 3 was run). The times listed are cumulative from all tens runs of each test. That should have mixed it up enough.

I've put the results in order. You'll notice that pipelined communication to the Domino server is clearly indicated over multiple concurrent communication. Within that, however, is the interesting result that even pipelined there is about a small advantage to having multiple Domino sessions. Personally, I think this is a terribly small advantage and in a servlet environment where the concurrency will not be quite so exact the contention should be lessened enough to make this negligible.

My own conclusion from this, is that based on the compromises of code simplicity, performance, and stability a single pipelined I/O queue thread as a static class should be the best way to handle all the Domino I/O for a single server. At some point I'll test multiple server access through the DIIOP thread.

The three machines are all running the same jvm (1.4) though the code is compiled as 1.3 compatible classes.

The single processor machine is my workstation, a cheap 1.7ghz Celeron with 1gb of RAM.

The "faster" of the two duals is a Dual P4 700mhz with 1gb of RAM, but its running a bunch of other stuff too. Also, that was the same machine as the Domino server, which tosses in some weird possibilities for contention but matches the real world case of where many java agents and servlets run.

The slower of the two duals is a Dual P-II 350mhz with 512megs of RAM running Windows NT (Yeah, yeah, but its still nice machine).

Single Processor Machine:

Test 2: 34,220ms. Pipelined, two sessions.
Test 1: 42,423ms. Pipelined, one session.
Test 4: 47,722ms. Threaded, two sessions.
Test 3: 53,765ms. Threaded, one session.

Dual Processor Machine, same machine as Domino:

Test 2: 37,596ms. Pipelined, two sessions.
Test 1: 40,155ms. Pipelined, one session.
Test 4: 51,767ms. Threaded, two sessions.
Test 3: 53,032ms. Threaded, one session.

Slower dual processor machine:

Test 2: 43,327ms. Pipelined, two sessions.
Test 1: 45,576ms. Pipelined, one session.
Test 3: 57,874ms. Threaded, one session.
Test 4: 67,298ms. Threaded, two sessions.

There are  - loading -  comments....

Other Recent Stories...

  1. 08/07/2015Here is one for you VMWARE gurus - particularly if you run ESXi without fancy drive arraysI think I may have just found the source of some real bottlenecks in my virtual environment. VMWARE is this incredibly powerful platform, and the ESXi version lets even a SOHO environment run multiple virtual machines, housing a whole environment in a single big box. I absolutely love it, and support several virtual environments using it in a few places. There are, however, some confusing settings that aren't easily understood or documented. When you're dealing with inexpensive gear, the issues are even ...... 
  2. 08/06/2015The Killer of Orphans (Orphan Documents)Those damn orphans are harder to kill than you think. Maybe you'll spot the error faster than I did -- or maybe this will help you. I have a customer with a help desk application created in the mid 1990s. It started causing major issues so I looked into it and found it had grown to over 20gb in size. A check of the database properties showed a whopping 453,355 documents, and of course, many of those have screen shots. When I spoke to the client, she swore she'd deleted everything older than 1/1/2015 and ...... 
  3. 06/02/2015Homeopathic Marketing: Traveler on my Android is now calling itself VERSE. Allow me to translate that for the IBM Notes community...I noticed today that my Traveler applications on Android have started calling themselves "IBM Verse" (e.g. "IBM VERSE - 2 New Messages"). I was confused at first, because I hadn't connected my test account on the IBM Verse cloud offering to my primary email at all. It turns out that no such connection exists. It's just a name change. Allow me to translate: Someone, or some group, fairly highly placed within the IBM adminisphere has finally come to the realization that the IBM Verse cloud offering (what we ...... 
  4. 03/17/2015A review of British Airways Premium Economy Service – How to destroy customer goodwill all at once 
  5. 02/26/2015There's a bug in how @TextToTime() and @ToTime() process date strings related to international standards and browser settings. 
  6. 01/21/2015Delivering two new presentations at Developer Camp (EntwicklerCamp) 2015 in Germany 
  7. 01/18/2015A brilliant concept -- Compulsive Narrative Syndrome 
  8. 01/16/2015Come talk to me at Connect in Orlando - I'll be there part of the time. 
  9. 12/04/2014Looking for a few people who want to beta test my new SSL Certificate Request tool. 
  10. 12/01/2014Well, it's official. IBM ConnectedED does not feel my contribution is worth the session time. 
Click here for more articles.....

pen icon Comment Entry
Your Name
*Your Email
* Your email address is required, but not displayed.
Your thoughts....
Remember Me  

Please wait while your document is saved.