Andrew Pollack's Blog

Technology, Family, Entertainment, Politics, and Random Noise

Does the Executive Branch of the U.S. Government (the President) have the Constitutional Authority to _NOT_ spend money allocated by the Congress?

By Andrew Pollack on 01/08/2013 at 09:53 AM EST

Congress passes the budget and spending bills. That's where all the taxes get decided, and all the spending gets decided. The executive branch is supposed to manage the organizations that go and spend that money as allocated.

Suppose Congress passes a budget that includes $100 Billion for tanks for the army. The army says it doesn't need them, but the money will go to a district with a powerful congressman so it ends up in the budget. Now, the President KNOWS that in six months the budget is going to run out of funding without a raise in the debt ceiling because the Congress passed the budget saying the money could be spent but didn't raise the debt ceiling enough to cover it.

Can the President tell the Pentagon to HOLD on buying those tanks? (answer is NO, apparently, see below)

There are many things just like those tanks in the budget, so assume I'm also talking about anything else he believes is either waste or lower priority. Meanwhile he continues or even accelerates spending on the social programs he believes are critical, so that when that debt ceiling comes around the funding for his social stuff is what's already been spent but the funding for the things he considers waste has not? There are many ways to do this aside from just saying "Don't buy the tanks". For example, the Executive branch could add so much red tape to the process, or force more competitive studies, delay decisions on final vendors, or any of a thousand other tricks to delay the spending.

The Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse strings. It is the job of the Congress to pass a budget every year. Without congress allocating funds, nothing gets spent. The Debt Ceiling fiasco comes because Congress allocates more money to be spent than that which comes in, increasing the debt, but then doesn't authorize the debt itself to be increased without coming back to Congress first for another negotiation. They've increased their own power. I'm wondering if by carefully allocating which funds are actually spent and when, the President can take some of that power back.

Update (thanks to Bob for giving me the right term to search on):

Wikipedia has a great summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impoundment_of_appropriated_funds

The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 was passed in response to perceived abuse of the power under President Nixon. Title X of the act, and its interpretation under Train v. City of New York, essentially removed the power. This severely inhibited a president's ability to reject congressionally-approved spending.

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 provides that the president may propose rescission of specific funds, but that rescission must be approved by both the House of Representatives and Senate within 45 days. In effect, this has removed the impoundment power, since Congress is not required to vote on the rescission and has ignored the vast majority of presidential requests.

Forty-three U.S. states give their governors the authority to not spend money allocated by the state legislature. The states which deny their governor the authority are Indiana, Maryland, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island, and Vermont. The Mayor of Washington, D.C. also has this power.


There are  - loading -  comments....

Thanks, BobBy Andrew Pollack on 01/08/2013 at 10:08 AM EST
Bob Balaban pointed to me Nixon's attempt at "Impoundment" of funds, which
seems as close as anything else. Here's a link.

http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-2/37-impoundment-of-appropriated-f
unds.html
re: Does the Executive Branch of the U.S. Government (the President) have the Constitutional Authority to _NOT_ spend money allocated by the Congress?By Bruce Perry on 01/08/2013 at 12:30 PM EST
Is this perhaps why presidents want a "line-item veto" and congress doesn't
want to give presidents this power? The presidential veto is a fairly blunt
instrument at present.


Other Recent Stories...

  1. 03/26/2019Undestanding how OAUTH scopes will bring the concept of APPS to your Domino serverWhile a full description of OATH is way beyond what I can do in this quick blog entry, I wanted to talk a bit about how "SCOPES" interact with the already rich authorization model used by Domino. Thanks to the fantastic work by John Curtis and his team, the node.js integration with Domino is going to be getting a rich security model. What we know is that a user's authorizations will be respected through the node.js application to the Domino server -- including reader names, ACLs, Roles, and so on. The way ...... 
  2. 02/05/2019Toro Yard Equipment - Not really a premium brand as far as I am concernedDear Toro Customer Service, I arm writing about the following machine: Toro Power Max 1120 OXEModel:38654S/N:31000#### Specifically, bearing part #:63-3450 This is the part ($15 online / $25 at the local dealer) that caused me to raise my objections on-line. This piece of garbage is supposed to be a bearing. It carries the shaft which drives both stages of the auger. The shaft passes through the bearing (which is what bearings do) after the auger drive pulley as the shaft goes through the back (engine ...... 
  3. 10/08/2018Will you be at the NYC Launch Event for HCL Domino v10 -- Find me!Come find me in NYC on Wednesday at the Launch Event if you're there. I really do want to talk to ...... 
  4. 09/04/2018With two big projects on hold, I suddenly find myself very available for new short and long term projects.  
  5. 07/13/2018Who is HCL and why is it a good thing that they are now the ones behind Notes and Domino? 
  6. 03/21/2018Domino Apps on IOS is a Game Changer. Quit holding back. 
  7. 02/15/2018Andrew’s Proposed Gun Laws 
  8. 05/05/2016Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism? 
  9. 04/20/2016Want to be whitelisted? Here are some sensible rules for web site advertising 
  10. 12/30/2015Fantastic new series on Syfy called “The Expanse” – for people who love traditional science fiction 
Click here for more articles.....


pen icon Comment Entry
Subject
Your Name
Homepage
*Your Email
* Your email address is required, but not displayed.
 
Your thoughts....
 
Remember Me  

Please wait while your document is saved.