Andrew Pollack's Blog

Technology, Family, Entertainment, Politics, and Random Noise

The Law of Unintended Consequences, as a moral stance.

By Andrew Pollack on 12/13/2005 at 10:41 AM EST

The Law of Unintended Consequences is simply the idea that you cannot accurately predict all the ramifications of your actions. If you're someone who believes the end result can justify the means used to achieve that result, it is this law which is constantly kicking your moral ass. If instead you choose to do the right thing for the present circumstances whenever possible, allowing for the future but not counting on it, you'll end up ahead of the game. Let me give you some examples of unintended consequences.

In a recent example, take a look at Open Office. This product comes on the scene and over the last year or so has really taken off. Its a freely available office suite that rivals Microsoft Office in a great many respects. Its good enough that most users could probably use it and never miss the Microsoft branded product. Microsoft REALLY doesn't like this. The competition, however, ended up being a good thing for the marketplace. Microsoft will be releasing the first new version of Office in a long time which really does add a lot of value to the average user. They were forced back to the drawing board to come up with innovations that were creative, hard to duplicate, and substantially beneficial. If you haven't seen previews yet, you're in for a treat. Who wins here? I think Microsoft ends up winning because they have a better product at the end. I think users win big because they have a low cost alternative and a very much higher functional alternative if they want to pay for it. The open source community probably wins a little by virtue of increased credibility and they've succeeded at causing some pain in Redmond, but in terms of winning desktops I think they've been set back at least a year. They've been bitten by the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Lets look back further though, to what really got me started thinking about this. Eugene J. McCarthy ran for the Democratic ticket against Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968, and though he lost that bid, he did better than anyone expected. He did so well that many people credit him for Robert F. Kennedy entering the race. The combination of the success of two strong anti-war candidates at his doorstep lead to LBJ dropping out of the race, leaving McCarthy and Kennedy to slug things out while Vice President Humphrey remained largely unscathed. Kennedy's assassination left a weakened McCarthy running against Humphrey, who ended up with the nomination largely due to the structure of the voting process. In the end, Humphrey lost to Nixon who quite probably would not have beat either McCarthy or Kennedy. Can we say that Nixon's Presidency was an unintended consequence of McCarthy's run against LBJ? Who could have predicted that sequence of events?

I've made the unpredictability of the Law of Unintended Consequences the basis for my own moral philosophy. That is to say, you cannot accurately predict the results of your actions sufficiently well to ever believe that the ends will justify the means. Rather, you should do the right thing based on what you know to be true at the time you have to make the decision. Its been my experience thus far, that you usually come out ahead in the long run.

There are  - loading -  comments....

A few pointsBy Bruce Perry on 12/15/2005 at 01:09 PM EST
Applied honestly, this seems a reasonable starting point. The trouble comes in
when you get to specific cases. There's the stuff we can all predict (fire
burns, water freezes, things fall down). There's events that are very likely
(drunk driving leads to accidents, most gamblers lose) that would lead a
strictly rational mind not to gamble or drive drunk, yet people do these
things. Then there are things we need experts to predict (we need a bridge to
hold up 25, cars, 3 trucks, and up to 4 feet of snow). Then there's things
like elections where even the "experts" aren't always right.

The first two words of the previous paragraph are critical. If a decision is
made without honestly evaluating the existing situation and considering likely
outcomes, then the decision maker is not off the hook in a moral sense. And
yes, I was thinking of the Iraq war, but this could equally well apply to some
business decisions I've seen as well.

Here's a few more scattered thoughts:

I think the open source community benefits in more ways than simply gaining
credibility and hurting Micro$oft. They gain document formats that aren't
subject to change without notice and with no appeal.

One of my favorite science fiction writers once said, "When you chose an
action, you chose the consequences of that action".

Other Recent Stories...

  1. 01/28/2020Copyright Troll WarningThere's a copyright troll firm that has automated reverse-image searches and goes around looking for any posted images that they can make a quick copyright claim on. This is not quite a scam because it's technically legal, but it's run very much like a scam. This company works with a few "clients" that have vast repositories of copyrighted images. The trolls do a reverse web search on those images looking for hits. When they find one on a site that looks like someone they can scare, they work it like ...... 
  2. 03/26/2019Undestanding how OAUTH scopes will bring the concept of APPS to your Domino serverWhile a full description of OATH is way beyond what I can do in this quick blog entry, I wanted to talk a bit about how "SCOPES" interact with the already rich authorization model used by Domino. Thanks to the fantastic work by John Curtis and his team, the node.js integration with Domino is going to be getting a rich security model. What we know is that a user's authorizations will be respected through the node.js application to the Domino server -- including reader names, ACLs, Roles, and so on. The way ...... 
  3. 02/05/2019Toro Yard Equipment - Not really a premium brand as far as I am concernedDear Toro Customer Service, I arm writing about the following machine: Toro Power Max 1120 OXEModel:38654S/N:31000#### Specifically, bearing part #:63-3450 This is the part ($15 online / $25 at the local dealer) that caused me to raise my objections on-line. This piece of garbage is supposed to be a bearing. It carries the shaft which drives both stages of the auger. The shaft passes through the bearing (which is what bearings do) after the auger drive pulley as the shaft goes through the back (engine ...... 
  4. 10/08/2018Will you be at the NYC Launch Event for HCL Domino v10 -- Find me! 
  5. 09/04/2018With two big projects on hold, I suddenly find myself very available for new short and long term projects.  
  6. 07/13/2018Who is HCL and why is it a good thing that they are now the ones behind Notes and Domino? 
  7. 03/21/2018Domino Apps on IOS is a Game Changer. Quit holding back. 
  8. 02/15/2018Andrew’s Proposed Gun Laws 
  9. 05/05/2016Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism? 
  10. 04/20/2016Want to be whitelisted? Here are some sensible rules for web site advertising 
Click here for more articles.....

pen icon Comment Entry
Your Name
*Your Email
* Your email address is required, but not displayed.
Your thoughts....
Remember Me  

Please wait while your document is saved.