Andrew Pollack's Blog

Technology, Family, Entertainment, Politics, and Random Noise

When does an application stop belonging to its owner?

By Andrew Pollack on 02/06/2010 at 08:43 AM EST

When an application becomes truly successful and people start relying on it for things they consider important, is there a point at which the application starts to belong to the owners? Facebook's latest change brings the topic to mind, but it can happen to you with internal applications as well. There comes a time when users begin to have a personal stake in the design of a good application.

Facebook makes a great example for when your users really own your application. Its user base is both extremely large and extremely broad in terms of user skill levels and technology sophistication, and its value is intrinsically tied to its size. The same application, started over with a blank slate, couldn't compete. To be competitive it would have to entice as large a user base to join or switch. It fills a niche that is not easily filled by just switching to some other service if people don't like a change. The value of its niche comes from the size of its audience. If you don't like a change, you're torn between the desire to go somewhere else for that functionality and the consequential loss of all your connections -- the whole value of the application. The result is the strong push back any time a change is made. Facebook finds itself having to be very careful not to get between someone who finally found an application exciting enough to bother learning to use the web, and her grand children. It happens in almost any media form. Authors talk about not being able to have characters grown and change. Popular TV shows, musicians, and even consumer products manufacturers face the same problem. They're under pressure to keep their products fresh and appeal to new audiences, but beloved by their huge customer base that resists just that kind of change.

We'd like all the applications we build to be so well liked that users resist any changes --- but if it's your application, you know where the flaws are. You know about the things people want that you can't do because of an architectural limitation. You know about the things that would make the application friendlier for some, but work against the slim business model you've carved out to make the app actually pay for itself.

Do you have apps that you really want to change, but can't because users like them the way they are? I'm curious, and would love to hear about them.


There are  - loading -  comments....

re: When does an application stop belonging to its owner?By Patrick Kwinten on 02/07/2010 at 06:39 AM EST
I am also curious since who does not want to have such apps in their product
portfolio?
re: When does an application stop belonging to its owner?By Theo Heselmans on 02/07/2010 at 12:01 PM EST
I got plenty of apps that fall in this 'can be improved a lot' category. But
usually it's not the fact that the customer doesn't want it improved, but
there's no budget for it even though I can sometimes prove the ROI.
I also had the opposite: Apps I wrote for a customer with functionality that
was way beyond there 'old' app, but I had to reduce the functionality (and UI)
because they liked the way their old app worked better. aaarrgghhh.


Other Recent Stories...

  1. 03/26/2019Undestanding how OAUTH scopes will bring the concept of APPS to your Domino serverWhile a full description of OATH is way beyond what I can do in this quick blog entry, I wanted to talk a bit about how "SCOPES" interact with the already rich authorization model used by Domino. Thanks to the fantastic work by John Curtis and his team, the node.js integration with Domino is going to be getting a rich security model. What we know is that a user's authorizations will be respected through the node.js application to the Domino server -- including reader names, ACLs, Roles, and so on. The way ...... 
  2. 02/05/2019Toro Yard Equipment - Not really a premium brand as far as I am concernedDear Toro Customer Service, I arm writing about the following machine: Toro Power Max 1120 OXEModel:38654S/N:31000#### Specifically, bearing part #:63-3450 This is the part ($15 online / $25 at the local dealer) that caused me to raise my objections on-line. This piece of garbage is supposed to be a bearing. It carries the shaft which drives both stages of the auger. The shaft passes through the bearing (which is what bearings do) after the auger drive pulley as the shaft goes through the back (engine ...... 
  3. 10/08/2018Will you be at the NYC Launch Event for HCL Domino v10 -- Find me!Come find me in NYC on Wednesday at the Launch Event if you're there. I really do want to talk to ...... 
  4. 09/04/2018With two big projects on hold, I suddenly find myself very available for new short and long term projects.  
  5. 07/13/2018Who is HCL and why is it a good thing that they are now the ones behind Notes and Domino? 
  6. 03/21/2018Domino Apps on IOS is a Game Changer. Quit holding back. 
  7. 02/15/2018Andrew’s Proposed Gun Laws 
  8. 05/05/2016Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism? 
  9. 04/20/2016Want to be whitelisted? Here are some sensible rules for web site advertising 
  10. 12/30/2015Fantastic new series on Syfy called “The Expanse” – for people who love traditional science fiction 
Click here for more articles.....


pen icon Comment Entry
Subject
Your Name
Homepage
*Your Email
* Your email address is required, but not displayed.
 
Your thoughts....
 
Remember Me  

Please wait while your document is saved.