Andrew Pollack's Blog

Technology, Family, Entertainment, Politics, and Random Noise

I ran into an upgrade issue when I moved from Domino 7.0 to 7.01 this weekend.

By Andrew Pollack on 05/15/2006 at 01:24 PM EDT

This lost me several hours over the weekend. It seems that 7.0.1 along with 6.5.4 there are some changes in the backend classes or in the LotusScript interface to those cases when storing data into fields. When moving from Domino 7.0 to 7.01 I ran into a problem which was oddly similar to the one I described last week.

In this case, a web application just stopped working correctly. It took me several hours to track down, because it happened that I wasn't upgrading a server, I was installing a new one and replicating the data over to it. I assumed for quite a while it was a data problem. It wasn't. A content area on a web application is populated by using a lookup to a view, then taking the most recent "n" entries from that view and displaying them as an html region. The formula looks like this:


This formula just wouldn't work, it kept returning @ERROR -- and @Text() around it wouldn't give me the error. I could view the columns in designer, client and even on the web by going to that view. It changed nothing. Finally, by paring down the layers over and over I got to an actual error message logged to the console of the server.

05/14/2006 12:58:41 PM HTTP Web Server: Lotus Notes Exception - Field is too large (32K) or View's column & selection formulas are too large [url]

Aha. You see, the lookup was the exact same size on the 7.0 server, but the 7.0.1 server balked at it. I had to make the view selection formula smaller in order to accomplish what I wanted more quickly. Its important to note that this lookup happens on COMPUTED TEXT not a field, and would never have been saved -- thus would never have been in a view column or selection formula, and would never have been summary data. It was done at display time and not saved.

A quick performance note: If I was worried about performance in this application, a MUCH smarter way to write this would be to run an agent once ever 5 or 15 minutes that did a similar lookup and wrote the results to a static value on a profile document or something.

There are  - loading -  comments....

you probably need IF1 or whatever it's calledBy Ken Yee on 05/16/2006 at 03:39 PM EDT
But PITA Lotus requires you to call into support and ask for it. It'll be
fixed in 7.02 and 6.55.

Basically, if your @dblookup returns an interim result bigger than 64K, it used
to be ok, but not in 7.01/6.54. It was beat to dead in the BP forum a few
months back, although I'm really disappointed Lotus didn't release 7.02 sooner

Other Recent Stories...

  1. 02/15/2018Andrew’s Proposed Gun LawsThese are my current thoughts on gun laws that would radically change the culture and safety of gun ownership in the United States without removing the rights of gun owners or compromising their privacy rights. * Please feel free to link to, or just copy, these ideas. It would be wonderful to see them spread widely and eventually become the basis for something to rally around and become legislation. 1. Background Check ProcessAnyone who wishes to be a gun owner can obtain a “gun owner id” card. These cards ...... 
  2. 05/05/2016Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism?Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism? I read a really insightful post a couple of days ago that suggested the use of social network funding sites like “Go Fund Me” and “Kickstarter” have come about and gained popularity in part because the existing economy in no longer serving its purpose for anyone who isn’t already wealthy. Have the traditional ways to get new ventures funded become closed to all but a few who aren’t already connected to them and so onerous as to make ...... 
  3. 04/20/2016Want to be whitelisted? Here are some sensible rules for web site advertisingAn increasing number of websites are now detecting when users have ad-blocking enabled, and refuse to show content unless you "whitelist" their site (disable your ad-blocking for them). I think that is a fair decision on their part, it's how they pay for the site. However, if you want me (and many others) to white list your site, there are some rules you should follow. If you violate these rules, I won't whitelist your site, I'll just find content elsewhere. 1. The total space taken up by advertisements ...... 
  4. 12/30/2015Fantastic new series on Syfy called “The Expanse” – for people who love traditional science fiction 
  5. 10/20/2015My suggestion is to stay away from PayAnywhere(dot)com  
  6. 08/07/2015Here is one for you VMWARE gurus - particularly if you run ESXi without fancy drive arrays 
  7. 08/06/2015The Killer of Orphans (Orphan Documents) 
  8. 06/02/2015Homeopathic Marketing: Traveler on my Android is now calling itself VERSE. Allow me to translate that for the IBM Notes community... 
  9. 03/17/2015A review of British Airways Premium Economy Service – How to destroy customer goodwill all at once 
  10. 02/26/2015There's a bug in how @TextToTime() and @ToTime() process date strings related to international standards and browser settings. 
Click here for more articles.....

pen icon Comment Entry
Your Name
*Your Email
* Your email address is required, but not displayed.
Your thoughts....
Remember Me  

Please wait while your document is saved.