Andrew Pollack's Blog

Technology, Family, Entertainment, Politics, and Random Noise

Agh. Just when you think your XPage is behaving -- something else IBM failed to do right. Validation on multi-document XPages

By Andrew Pollack on 03/02/2012 at 02:25 PM EST

UPDATE: This is actually something already fixed. Paul Withers pointed me to this fix: I just had to check this box on the button event.



Now I'm off to eat some crow....


You have got to be kidding me. It turns out that if you have multiple data sources (documents) on different parts of your XPage, although you can individually toggle them into and out of edit mode, save them or discard them individually, and generally act on them as you'd expect; if you attempt to use the built in XPages validation functionality (which would be quite nice if it worked) -- you can't realistically separate it so only the validation events related to the document you're acting on get fired off.

That is to say, if you have DOC1 and DOC2 both in edit mode and you attempt to save DOC1 -- all of DOC2's validation code fires as well. If you're not done editing DOC2, it doesn't matter. You get validation failures and your DOC1 change doesn't complete. I detailed the specifics of the problem I'm having over here on Stack Overflow if anyone wants to show me I'm wrong. (thanks Paul Withers for doing just that)

I've seen several attempts to work around this -- some come pretty close. Particularly Tommy Valand's work -- though that falls down once one of the fields does invalidate for a valid reason, and the whole page has to be reloaded to set things right. I've also figured out a pretty complex way to make it work by using the events that fire both server and client side on each button to change the validation requirements of the various fields elsewhere in the XPage. These are hacks, and generally they require so much work you may as well just write your own damn client and server side validation code and ignore what IBM has done in XPages.

In searching, I've seen plenty of comments from XPages supporters saying "IBM is very much aware of this problem and is working on a solution" -- as Yoda might say "Fucking break you must give me!". We're several years and several revisions into a product that was already on the market (though truly not actually being sold to many people) at the time they bought it. This kind of amateur hour crap should have been dealt with years ago. And it was dealt with already.


There are  - loading -  comments....

re: Agh. Just when you think your XPage is behaving -- something else IBM failed to do right. Validation on multi-document XPagesBy Me on 03/02/2012 at 04:41 PM EST
I now know why you were dumped from the design partner program... to much
complaining..

Don't like it.. move to doing Microsoft or Oracle
re: Agh. Just when you think your XPage is behaving -- something else IBM failed to do right. Validation on multi-document XPagesBy Andrew Pollack on 03/02/2012 at 04:54 PM EST
Thanks, Ed Maloney.

I used to provide feedback "in the family" through channels. Unfortunately,
the people who did listen to it were generally in agreement but weren't placed
well enough to be able to get the solutions funded. The people who made the
decisions only wanted buy in, not real feedback.

I believe it is perfectly valid to make the people who make the decisions on
what to fund as uncomfortable with the bad design decisions that result as I
possibly can.

You know, you're welcome to comment here, but we do ask that you give your
name. I opted not to delete yours because, frankly, you're not very good at
being anonymous.

I suppose I should add that your company in particular gets quite a bit of
extra attention due to some personal relationships at higher levels between the
IBM Lotus side and the upper management side there. You should keep in mind
that the kind of attention you've see there is most definitely NOT typical.
re: Agh. Just when you think your XPage is behaving -- something else IBM failed to do right. Validation on multi-document XPagesBy Ed Maloney on 03/03/2012 at 12:50 PM EST
"Nothing further, your honor"
re: Agh. Just when you think your XPage is behaving -- something else IBM failed to do right. Validation on multi-document XPagesBy Andrew Pollack on 03/03/2012 at 01:14 PM EST
Fair enough. I do make it a point to be just as loud when I'm wrong. It does
happen.


Other Recent Stories...

  1. 04/04/2020How many Ventilators for the price of those tanks the Pentagon didn't even want?This goes WAY beyond Trump or Obama. This is decades of poor planning and poor use of funds. Certainly it should have been addressed in the Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Reagan administrations -- all of which were well aware of the implications of a pandemic. I want a military prepared to help us, not just hurt other people. As an American I expect that with the ridiculous funding of our military might, we are prepared for damn near everything. Not just killing people and breaking things, but ...... 
  2. 01/28/2020Copyright Troll WarningThere's a copyright troll firm that has automated reverse-image searches and goes around looking for any posted images that they can make a quick copyright claim on. This is not quite a scam because it's technically legal, but it's run very much like a scam. This company works with a few "clients" that have vast repositories of copyrighted images. The trolls do a reverse web search on those images looking for hits. When they find one on a site that looks like someone they can scare, they work it like ...... 
  3. 03/26/2019Undestanding how OAUTH scopes will bring the concept of APPS to your Domino serverWhile a full description of OATH is way beyond what I can do in this quick blog entry, I wanted to talk a bit about how "SCOPES" interact with the already rich authorization model used by Domino. Thanks to the fantastic work by John Curtis and his team, the node.js integration with Domino is going to be getting a rich security model. What we know is that a user's authorizations will be respected through the node.js application to the Domino server -- including reader names, ACLs, Roles, and so on. The way ...... 
  4. 02/05/2019Toro Yard Equipment - Not really a premium brand as far as I am concerned 
  5. 10/08/2018Will you be at the NYC Launch Event for HCL Domino v10 -- Find me! 
  6. 09/04/2018With two big projects on hold, I suddenly find myself very available for new short and long term projects.  
  7. 07/13/2018Who is HCL and why is it a good thing that they are now the ones behind Notes and Domino? 
  8. 03/21/2018Domino Apps on IOS is a Game Changer. Quit holding back. 
  9. 02/15/2018Andrew’s Proposed Gun Laws 
  10. 05/05/2016Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism? 
Click here for more articles.....


pen icon Comment Entry
Subject
Your Name
Homepage
*Your Email
* Your email address is required, but not displayed.
 
Your thoughts....
 
Remember Me  

Please wait while your document is saved.