Andrew Pollack's Blog

Technology, Family, Entertainment, Politics, and Random Noise

The economics of MMORPG's is fascinating stuff

By Andrew Pollack on 01/11/2006 at 10:39 AM EST

A friend forwarded a link to an article written on the impact of "Farming" in the "World of Warcraft" online game. "Farming" in this case refers to companies set up in low-wage countries where players are hired to run characters which generate in game wealth which can be sold in the real world to players who want a leg-up for their in game characters. The article does a decent job explaining how farming actually happens but doesn't begin to accurately consider the impact on the in-game economy, IMO. For those who don't know, and MMORPG is a "Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game". Think of it as "Dungeons and Dragons" with potentially millions of people in your living room. The game designers try to create a fully functional virtual world which can operate on its own with little or now outside intervention.

Keep in mind as you read my commentary on this article are that I'm not a player, but have studied it at least a little. I'm also making some assumptions from the article in terms of the actual workings of this in-game economic environment, and also assuming that the people running the game are tinkering as little as possible. This last bit is a big assumption.

Some of you players out there can check me on this. Some of you economists can now laugh at my attempt to figure this out.

With reference to "Secrets of Massively Multiplayer Farming" -- http://www.gameguidesonline.com/guides/articles/ggoarticleoctober05_01.asp

First, I think Paul is missing a key economic issue here in regards inflation. As I read the article, a great deal of the farming happens in "Instances" -- which I understand to be repeatable areas in the game which are the same to everyone and do not change as a result of what happens in them in a previous use by a player or other players.

If this is true, an instance which is repeatedly farmed yields more items of value each time it is used. Unless these instances are "zero sum" in some way, meaning they have a "cost" to enter and the items found in them are accounted for against this cost to the system, the continued use of these instances by farmers would in fact increase the amount of gold available in the system.

An economy works like this:

Each member of an economy - a worker - must buy things. To meet their needs, they spend money. Each must also produce things in order to earn enough money to meet these needs. We all know this. To "Succeed" in an economy, you have to earn more than you need. Earning more than you need allows you to buy luxury items and spend time doing things other than working to earn more money. When you buy luxury items, you generate income for those who produce (or find, or capture) those items.

In the case Paul describes, Farmers have a strange set of impacts. They do not buy luxury items, and do not look for free time. They spend 100% of the their time working to be most profitable while seeking maximum efficiency rather than style or joy when outfitting or supplying their own needs. Basically, they skew the marketplace. The impacts of this should be very complex. Here's what comes to mind:

Though you cannot, generally, compete with a farmer in direct terms of producing more raw goods which have value in the same time, you might be able to get more for specialized goods which are eschewed by farmers because you can hold an auction for a longer period. This divides the goods in the economy into two classes. Those which are more easily farmed become commodity items, while those which are less routinely available become specialty goods. This mirrors the real world, in fact. There are mass produced goods and speciality or custom goods. Mass produced goods will suffer heavy downward pressure on price pretty much all the time, while specialty goods will fluctuate much more with the overall economy. If players are earning "enough" to get them past the simple needs which are satisfied by 'farmed' (commodity) goods, they'll have expendable capitol for the luxury items. If a majority are in that boat, luxury goods prices increase.

So far, all of this sounds like a fairly stable kind of dynamic economy even if it doesn't really mirror our own. If anything, it will tend to be beneficial to players because their basic needs will become cheaper to satisfy, allowing them more funds to customize and be creative. Since customization and creativity are the motivational factors for players entering the game, this is probably a good thing.

Another impact of these side-economies which happen outside the game one, is that a player with non-game funds can escalate to a level of play they didn't personally earn. Is that bad? While I believe those players who earn every bit of recognition or level or whatever may resent it, they'll probably find what really happens is the newbies tend to be easy marks. They're probably playing over their heads. They'll tend to be less careful with purchases, which they'll make in large shopping areas. They're the yuppie suburbanites. They'll support the malls and fashion shows and so on. The die hard players then, will be the ones who know about the discount locations and the smart tactics that can only be gained from experience. They'll beat the yuppies in terms of getting the most for their trade goods, getting the best deals on their own supplies, and if they go head to head will probably have a significant tactical advantage from real experience.

While the yuppies put upward pressure on prices, the growth of farming tends to put downward pressure on the same items. If there were less yuppies, there could be less farmers. If there were less farmers, the increased non-game costs for buying in-game wealth would limit the number of yuppies.

It gets more and more complex the more you consider it.


There are  - loading -  comments....

re: The economics of MMORPG's is fascinating stuffBy Luwow Goldman on 03/21/2009 at 11:57 AM EDT
Not to sure what you are trying to say..I mean is it or is it not.

Anyhow I know I am rambling but try to see it from someone reading it the first
time without thinking about it first.
rel="dofollow">Luwow Goldman
re: The economics of MMORPG's is fascinating stuffBy Chris on 07/25/2009 at 11:29 AM EDT
The problem is the way that economics in game are implemented. We play against
the game for money and against each other for fun.

Real people need to come into the equation when determining how wealthy you are
relative to other players. I have posted my solution to the problem in this
presentation. http://www.slideshare.net/talin/mmo-economics-concept-v-10
re: The economics of MMORPG's is fascinating stuffBy primebarsdaily on 07/27/2009 at 04:04 PM EDT
I think this concept of virtual economies is fascinating. I'd agree completely
that less farmers would increase the non-game cost of buying in-game wealth and
minimize the nub population but it also brings down the value and GPD for the
entire online economy. I'd rather see how far we could go and how much we could
learn from a virtual community and economy with more wealth than those that we
inhabit in actuality.
re: The economics of MMORPG's is fascinating stuffBy Timpop on 11/03/2009 at 01:06 AM EST
One thing you hadn't considered, is that the farmers (with mass amounts of
in-game currency) and those who earn in-game currency through non-game
bartering are able to drive the prices of specialty items well beyond what
should be considered affordable; making it a lot harder for your average player
to afford those items.


Other Recent Stories...

  1. 03/26/2019Undestanding how OAUTH scopes will bring the concept of APPS to your Domino serverWhile a full description of OATH is way beyond what I can do in this quick blog entry, I wanted to talk a bit about how "SCOPES" interact with the already rich authorization model used by Domino. Thanks to the fantastic work by John Curtis and his team, the node.js integration with Domino is going to be getting a rich security model. What we know is that a user's authorizations will be respected through the node.js application to the Domino server -- including reader names, ACLs, Roles, and so on. The way ...... 
  2. 02/05/2019Toro Yard Equipment - Not really a premium brand as far as I am concernedDear Toro Customer Service, I arm writing about the following machine: Toro Power Max 1120 OXEModel:38654S/N:31000#### Specifically, bearing part #:63-3450 This is the part ($15 online / $25 at the local dealer) that caused me to raise my objections on-line. This piece of garbage is supposed to be a bearing. It carries the shaft which drives both stages of the auger. The shaft passes through the bearing (which is what bearings do) after the auger drive pulley as the shaft goes through the back (engine ...... 
  3. 10/08/2018Will you be at the NYC Launch Event for HCL Domino v10 -- Find me!Come find me in NYC on Wednesday at the Launch Event if you're there. I really do want to talk to ...... 
  4. 09/04/2018With two big projects on hold, I suddenly find myself very available for new short and long term projects.  
  5. 07/13/2018Who is HCL and why is it a good thing that they are now the ones behind Notes and Domino? 
  6. 03/21/2018Domino Apps on IOS is a Game Changer. Quit holding back. 
  7. 02/15/2018Andrew’s Proposed Gun Laws 
  8. 05/05/2016Is the growing social-sourced economy the modern back door into socialism? 
  9. 04/20/2016Want to be whitelisted? Here are some sensible rules for web site advertising 
  10. 12/30/2015Fantastic new series on Syfy called “The Expanse” – for people who love traditional science fiction 
Click here for more articles.....


pen icon Comment Entry
Subject
Your Name
Homepage
*Your Email
* Your email address is required, but not displayed.
 
Your thoughts....
 
Remember Me  

Please wait while your document is saved.